Repeating Command Block
Common
Building Block

Repeating Command Block

Building BlockCommonUnbreakableBlast Proof

Repeating Command Block is a common building block block in Minecraft. This block is unbreakable in survival mode. It has high blast resistance, making it explosion-proof.

links
Entity Relationship Graph

Version Timeline

Added in 1.21.1
Removed in 26.1-snapshot-7
properties

Block Properties

Internal IDminecraft:repeating_command_block
CategoryBuilding Block
Stack Size64
HardnessUnbreakable
Blast Resistance3600000 (Blast Proof)
Transparent✗ No
Light LevelNone
commands

Commands

Give Command

/give @p minecraft:repeating_command_block 1

Set Block Command

/setblock ~ ~ ~ minecraft:repeating_command_block
mining

Mining Information

Required Tool

Any tool or hand

Mining Time

Cannot be mined

Silk Touch

May give different drop

Fortune Effect

No effect

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I break Repeating Command Block?
Repeating Command Block can be broken with any tool or by hand. However, using the appropriate tool will speed up the process.
Is Repeating Command Block blast resistant?
Yes, Repeating Command Block has high blast resistance (3600000) and cannot be destroyed by explosions including TNT and creepers.
What is the Minecraft ID for Repeating Command Block?
The internal Minecraft ID for Repeating Command Block is "minecraft:repeating_command_block". You can use this ID with commands like /setblock, /fill, and /give.
about

About Repeating Command Block

Repeating Command Block is a common block in Minecraft, categorized as a building block block. The internal game ID for this block is minecraft:repeating_command_block.

This block is indestructible in survival mode, making it one of the most durable blocks in the game.

Repeating Command Block is a solid, opaque block that blocks light and allows mobs to spawn on its surface in dark conditions. It has exceptional blast resistance (3600000), making it completely immune to all explosions including TNT, creepers, and the Wither.

Comments(0)

Sign in to join the discussion